← Back to Directory
White Bim Black Ear
Movie

White Bim Black Ear

1977Unknown

Woke Score
1.2
out of 10

Plot

A touching story about a white Gordon Setter with black ear, who became homeless because of his master's illness. His master, Ivan Ivanovich, a man far from being young, fond of hunting and nature, took a puppy to live with him, despite the dog's black ear being a "shame of nature" to his breed. The man always took his dog, whom he called Bim or Bimka, to hunting in country. Later, however Ivan Ivanovich began to have problems with heart and when the disease became worse was taken to a hospital. His dog couldn't bear waiting for the only person that ever cared for him and set out to find his master. Thus began the story of a homeless dog and his many breathtaking and exciting adventures, encounters of many people, kind and evil, and leads to an unexpected and heart-rending end.

Overall Series Review

White Bim Black Ear is a profound and deeply emotional Soviet drama from 1977, focusing on the loyalty of a dog, Bim, who is separated from his kind master, Ivan Ivanovich, a retired writer and war veteran, due to the man's heart illness. The plot follows Bim's heartbreaking journey to find his owner, acting as a lens through which the audience witnesses the full spectrum of human nature—from selfless kindness to outright cruelty and indifference. The film's central moral is one of universal meritocracy, where characters are judged purely on the content of their soul and their actions towards a defenseless creature. It is a timeless story about love, friendship, and the presence of both virtue and vice in society, entirely devoid of the themes related to modern identity politics or intersectional ideology. The main conflict revolves around the dog's 'otherness' (his black ear) being the source of judgment by cruel humans, but the film's moral core unequivocally rejects this superficial judgment.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics1/10

The core narrative conflict centers on Bim the dog being rejected for his black ear, a 'defect' to his breed, which is a direct metaphor for judging an individual by an immutable, superficial characteristic. The film champions the dog’s inherent goodness and the master’s acceptance of him, directly opposing judgment based on surface-level identity. Human characters are judged by their kindness or cruelty to the dog, which is a universal, merit-based moral code. The film does not rely on race or intersectional hierarchy and does not vilify the white male protagonist, Ivan Ivanovich, who is depicted as a deeply good man and war veteran.

Oikophobia2/10

The film acts as a slice-of-life portrait of Soviet society, exposing the cruelty and indifference found within its social fabric. The narrative criticizes moral failings—specifically human malice, indifference, and bureaucracy—within the home culture. This is a moral critique of individual vice, not a fundamental rejection or demonization of Western civilization, which is not the setting. The male protagonist, a war veteran, embodies respect for the sacrifices of the nation's past.

Feminism1/10

Gender dynamics are traditional and complementary. The male protagonist, Ivan Ivanovich, is the morally centered figure, depicted as a protective, loving, and steadfast master. While some minor female characters are antagonists (a cruel neighbor), this is balanced by kind characters of all genders. There is no 'Girl Boss' trope, no emasculation of males, and no anti-natal or anti-family messaging present in the story, which focuses on the bond between a man and his dog.

LGBTQ+1/10

The film centers on the devoted male-animal bond between Ivan Ivanovich and Bim. The narrative is entirely focused on themes of loyalty, friendship, and human morality. There is no presence of alternative sexualities, deconstruction of the nuclear family unit, or promotion of gender ideology.

Anti-Theism1/10

The story is fundamentally a moral examination of 'human souls,' which explores a binary of good versus evil and kindness versus cruelty. This framework acknowledges an objective and transcendent moral law against which the characters' actions are measured. The conflict is secular and moral rather than explicitly religious, but there is no hostility toward religion or promotion of moral relativism; the dog’s unconditional loyalty is presented as a high moral truth.