← Back to Directory
Once Upon a Time in America
Movie

Once Upon a Time in America

1984Crime, Drama

Woke Score
4
out of 10

Plot

With the vivid memory of his long-gone childhood friends Max, Patsy, and Cockeye etched in his mind, his ferociously loyal partners-in-crime during their rise to prominence in New York's Prohibition-era Lower East Side, the defeated, penniless, and guilt-ridden former gangster David "Noodles" Aaronson returns to Manhattan. Not knowing what to expect on his mission to shed light on his opaque past, grizzled Noodles reunites with his only living friend Fat Moe after 35 haunted years of self-exile. However, the relentless, piercing sound of culpability stands in the way of finding closure, as the inscrutable content of a well-worn leather suitcase further complicates matters. And now, against the backdrop of a torn conscience, the sad, bittersweet recollections of more than 50 years of love, death, and everything in-between become inextricably intertwined, leading to even more puzzling questions. But what are a man's options when he is left with nothing?

Overall Series Review

Sergio Leone's final film is an expansive, non-linear epic of guilt, memory, and profound betrayal set across five decades of a Jewish-American gangster's life. The story follows David 'Noodles' Aaronson and his lifelong friend Max as they transition from impoverished, ambitious youths on the Lower East Side to powerful, ruthless Prohibition-era criminals and finally, as old men reckoning with their past. The film is a hyper-masculine drama that presents a melancholic, brutal critique of the American Dream, equating its pursuit with violence, greed, and corruption. The narrative is heavily male-centric, and its portrayal of women is notoriously limited, often depicting them as objects of desire, transaction, or violence, leading to scenes that are difficult and unflinching. Its complexity lies in the ambiguous nature of its narrative, potentially framed entirely as a drug-induced fantasy, which allows the main character to grapple with his colossal betrayals and moral failures without offering easy sympathy or redemption. The film contains none of the hallmarks of modern media's 'woke' agenda, instead operating on themes of old-world ambition, tribal loyalty, and the corrupting power of vice.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics3/10

The narrative focuses on a specific ethnic immigrant group, Jewish youths, whose outsider status and poverty propel them into crime, reflecting a historically authentic path of organized crime in New York. The characters’ Jewish heritage and immigrant struggle are fundamental to their origin and motivation, but the plot itself exists as a classic gangster epic of rise and fall. The film does not vilify 'whiteness' as a political concept or contain any forced insertion of diversity; casting is authentic to the specific ethnic milieu of the story.

Oikophobia7/10

The film engages in a strong deconstruction of the 'American Dream,' portraying the nation's trajectory of growth and success as inherently compromised. One major character explicitly refers to the merciless violence and greed required to achieve the American Dream as a 'disease' ingrained in the country. The acquisition of wealth and power is framed as a fundamentally corrupting process from the nation's foundation, which aligns with the deconstruction of heritage.

Feminism1/10

The film operates entirely opposite to the 'Girl Boss' and anti-natalist narrative. The world is overwhelmingly male-dominated and hyper-masculine, with women serving limited, often objectified roles. Female characters are frequently subjected to severe violence and objectification, including multiple instances of sexual assault, in a manner that critics widely condemn as misogynistic. Male characters are depicted as toxic, brutal, and powerful criminals, the antithesis of the emasculated male trope.

LGBTQ+2/10

The primary structure of the film is built around traditional male-female pairings and the intense, complex bond of a male-centric gang. Sexuality is private or transactional, focusing on heterosexual vice, or is a subtextual element driving the central male relationship. There is no explicit centering of alternative sexualities, deconstruction of the nuclear family through an ideological lens, or lecturing on gender theory. The narrative maintains a normative structure of the time period depicted.

Anti-Theism5/10

The characters operate in a spiritual vacuum where morality is entirely subjective, determined by power dynamics and self-interest, which is characteristic of the nihilism often found in the crime genre. The film does not feature a source of transcendent morality, nor does it acknowledge a higher moral law in the protagonists' actions. However, there is no explicit hostility toward organized religion, nor is there a direct villainization of Christian characters as bigots; faith simply appears absent from the protagonists' moral framework.