← Back to Directory
Casino
Movie

Casino

1995Crime, Drama

Woke Score
1.4
out of 10

Plot

This Martin Scorsese film depicts the Janus-like quality of Las Vegas--it has a glittering, glamorous face, as well as a brutal, cruel one. Ace Rothstein and Nicky Santoro, mobsters who move to Las Vegas to make their mark, live and work in this paradoxical world. Seen through their eyes, each as a foil to the other, the details of mob involvement in the casinos of the 1970s and '80s are revealed. Ace is the smooth operator of the Tangiers casino, while Nicky is his boyhood friend and tough strongman, robbing and shaking down the locals. However, they each have a tragic flaw--Ace falls in love with a hustler, Ginger, and Nicky falls into an ever-deepening spiral of drugs and violence.

Overall Series Review

Martin Scorsese's epic crime drama examines the brutal, self-destructive rise and fall of mob associates Ace Rothstein and Nicky Santoro in 1970s and '80s Las Vegas. The narrative is a sprawling study of individual vice, greed, and misplaced trust, using the casino world as a metaphor for the corrupt American Dream. The film centers entirely on the fatal flaws of its main characters, whose moral decay and hubris lead to their inevitable, violent destruction. It presents a world where all the central figures—including the calculating casino operator, the volatile enforcer, and the hustler wife—are complexly and tragically flawed, their downfalls being a direct consequence of their own bad decisions, lust, and avarice. The focus is on criminal subculture and human nature, not modern social or identity politics. The film is a classic moral tragedy, unflinching in its depiction of a world devoid of honor and ultimately consumed by its own excess.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics1/10

The plot is strictly focused on the criminal actions, competence, and individual flaws of the characters, who are judged solely by the results of their behavior within the mob hierarchy, which is a system of brutal meritocracy. The casting of Italian-American and Jewish-American characters reflects the historical authenticity of the organized crime figures the story is based upon. The narrative does not utilize race or immutable characteristics to frame systemic oppression or vilify whiteness.

Oikophobia2/10

The film’s critique is aimed at the corruption and excess of a specific American location and business—mob-run Las Vegas—which is portrayed as a 'paradise on earth' that inevitably self-destructs due to greed. This is a classic critique of American capitalism/excess that serves a moral parable function, not an indictment of foundational Western civilization or its core institutions. The city's downfall is presented as a tragic consequence of internal chaos and criminality, not an argument for civilizational self-hatred.

Feminism1/10

The primary female character, Ginger McKenna, is a deeply flawed, self-destructive hustler, addict, and manipulator who is completely undone by her own vices, instability, and inability to relinquish her past. She is explicitly not an idealized 'Girl Boss' figure. The male leads, Ace and Nicky, are highly competent in their criminal fields but fatally flawed by naiveté and pure violence, respectively, making them active, central figures, not bumbling idiots. The film portrays a dysfunctional, non-traditional marriage built on transaction, not a critique of motherhood or family as an institution.

LGBTQ+1/10

The film is entirely centered on the heterosexual relationships, rivalries, and dynamics within the criminal underworld and Las Vegas society of the 1970s and 1980s. The narrative does not contain any centering of alternative sexualities, and there is no messaging about queer theory, gender ideology, or deconstructing the nuclear family structure.

Anti-Theism2/10

The film functions as a moral and almost religious parable of sin, temptation, and damnation, consistent with the director's traditional Catholic themes. Ace's narration even calls Vegas a 'morality car wash' that ultimately fails to wash away the characters' sins. The downfall of the characters is framed as the inevitable consequence of their greed and disregard for any objective moral law, not a vilification of traditional religion or an endorsement of subjective morality.