← Back to Kamen Rider
Kamen Rider Season 18
Season Analysis

Kamen Rider

Season 18 Analysis

Season Woke Score
2
out of 10

Season Overview

Twenty-two years after the disappearance of his father, Wataru Kurenai lives in an infamous "haunted house" where he is destined as Kamen Rider Kiva to fight life-draining monsters called Fangires, the very race his father fought years ago before his disappearance. Wataru must also deal with Kamen Rider Ixa who is part of an organization seeking to destroy the Fangire menace, as well as the Fangires' own Rider, Kamen Rider Saga. The story is split between the actions of Wataru in the present (2008-09) and his father Otoya in the past (1986-87), slowly revealing the link between the Fangire Race and Kiva.

Season Review

Kamen Rider Kiva is a character-driven, non-linear gothic horror saga split across two timelines, 1986 and 2008. The story revolves around father Otoya and son Wataru, who is half-Fangire, and their respective struggles against a vampiric monster race. The central theme is the exploration of identity and destiny, focusing on Wataru's emotional growth from a shy recluse to a king who seeks peace between the warring human and Fangire races. The show champions traditional concepts of family lineage, personal sacrifice, and the enduring power of love. The human anti-monster organization is shown to be flawed and bigoted, creating conflict for the hero, but the overall message is one of objective morality and reconciliation, not civilizational self-hatred. Romance and traditional family structure, culminating in a marriage, form key plot points.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics3/10

The narrative's central conflict is a war between the human race and the Fangire monster race. The hero, Wataru, has mixed heritage and must learn to accept both halves of his identity to achieve his full power, rather than prioritizing one over the other. The series uses this racial conflict (Fangire vs. Human) as a core plot device, which touches on identity, but the conflict is resolved by finding peace based on mutual respect and merit, not by lecturing on human intersectional hierarchies or privilege.

Oikophobia2/10

There is no demonstrable hostility toward Japanese culture or ancestors. The father figure, Otoya, is a flamboyant but heroic man of skill and sacrifice who ultimately saves the world. The human anti-Fangire organization is portrayed as deeply flawed and hateful in their zealotry, which serves as an internal critique of human fear and prejudice against an 'Other' rather than a demonization of the home culture itself. The final victory is the establishment of peace and stability.

Feminism3/10

Female characters like Yuri and her daughter Megumi are active Fangire Hunters and use the Ixa Rider System. They display agency, determination, and competence as fighters. However, the narrative frequently places limitations on their ability to permanently use the Ixa system due to physical constraints or emotional instability. They often require the intervention of male characters. The series ends with Megumi marrying her male teammate, a clear affirmation of the nuclear family structure, and motherhood is treated with dramatic significance.

LGBTQ+1/10

The story adheres strictly to a normative structure, with the primary romantic subplots being explicitly heterosexual across both timelines (Otoya/Yuri/Maya and Wataru/Mio). The series concludes with a celebratory marriage between a core male and female character. There is no inclusion of alternative sexualities, deconstruction of the nuclear family unit, or discussion of gender ideology.

Anti-Theism2/10

The series does not contain themes of anti-theism. The moral framework is clearly transcendent, defining the Fangire King's misanthropist, supremacist goals as objectively evil and Wataru's pursuit of love and universal compassion as objectively good. The supernatural elements are based on a gothic/vampire motif, and while the human organization is named after a Christian/crusader-esque ideal (IXA), this system is not a critique of religion itself but of the organization's flawed application of power and its prejudice.