← Back to Directory
Jurassic World
Movie

Jurassic World

2015 • Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

Woke Score
3
out of 10

Plot

Twenty-two years after the original Jurassic Park failed, the new park, also known as Jurassic World, is open for business. After years of studying genetics, the scientists on the park genetically engineer a new breed of dinosaur, the Indominus Rex. When everything goes horribly wrong, will our heroes make it off the island?

Overall Series Review

The film centers on the disastrous consequences of corporate greed and human hubris in genetically modifying nature for profit. The plot follows park operations manager Claire Dearing and raptor expert Owen Grady as they try to save Claire's nephews and the park's visitors from a newly engineered hybrid dinosaur, the Indominus Rex. The narrative is driven by classic disaster movie tropes and action, not political or social lectures. The primary thematic critique is aimed at reckless corporate entities and the overreach of science without moral caution, a consistent thread throughout the entire franchise. The gender dynamics feature a career-focused female lead whose arc involves valuing family and partnership equally with her career, working alongside a competent male lead. There is no presence of identity politics or modern sexual ideology.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

The plot's conflict is rooted in corporate greed and human arrogance, not intersectional identity. The central villain is an ambitious white male security chief, but other morally compromised characters include the morally dubious Asian-American geneticist and the reckless South-Asian-Malian park owner. Character competence and morality are spread across diverse actors, maintaining a focus on individual actions and universal human flaws rather than immutable characteristics.

Oikophobia4/10

The film critiques corporate institutions and the Western-style park's obsession with commerce and spectacle over safety and nature. The narrative frames the human attempt to package and profit from nature as reckless and corrupt. However, the critique targets specific corporate and scientific hubris, not Western civilization or ancestry as a whole, which keeps the score moderate.

Feminism3/10

The female lead, Claire Dearing, begins as an emotionally distant, hyper-professional manager. Her character arc is defined by a 'metamorphosis' where she reconnects with her family and embraces a more emotional, nurturing, and complementary role alongside the competent male lead. The film does not depict motherhood as a prison or men as bumbling idiots; instead, it advocates for the balance between career and personal relationships, placing it low on the anti-natalist spectrum.

LGBTQ+1/10

The narrative adheres to a normative structure. The central relationship is a traditional male-female pairing, and the two main children are a brother and brother. The film's themes are entirely focused on corporate ethics, science, and survival. There is no presence of alternative sexual ideology, deconstruction of the nuclear family as a theme, or gender theory lecturing.

Anti-Theism2/10

The film is heavily steeped in the moral lesson of human hubris, echoing the 'man playing God' cautionary tale of the original story. The disaster is framed as a direct consequence of scientific overreach and lack of respect for nature's 'higher law' ('life finds a way'). The movie does not vilify traditional religion or feature any anti-theistic messaging; its morality is based on acknowledging an objective boundary for human action.