← Back to Directory
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Movie

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

2007 • Action, Adventure, Family

Woke Score
2
out of 10

Plot

After a lonely summer on Privet Drive, Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) returns to a Hogwarts full of ill-fortune. Few of students and parents believe him or Dumbledore (Sir Michael Gambon) that Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) is really back. The ministry had decided to step in by appointing a new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, Professor Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), who proves to be the nastiest person Harry has ever encountered. Harry also can't help stealing glances with the beautiful Cho Chang (Katie Leung). To top it off are dreams that Harry can't explain, and a mystery behind something for which Voldemort is searching. With these many things, Harry begins one of his toughest years at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

Overall Series Review

The film focuses on a political allegory that criticizes authoritarianism and identity-based prejudice. The Ministry of Magic's denial of Lord Voldemort's return and its subsequent heavy-handed control over Hogwarts mirrors the suppression of truth by a corrupt governing institution. The central conflict opposes a 'blood-purity' fascist ideology (Voldemort/Death Eaters) with a universalist stance where character and skill, not lineage, define worth. Female characters are notably powerful and competent, though the wizarding society itself retains many traditional structural elements. The narrative is driven by an objective moral battle between good and evil, emphasizing courage, loyalty, and self-sacrifice.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

The main ideological conflict is the fight against 'pure-blood' supremacy, an allegorical critique of racism and eugenics, which is the inverse of contemporary identity politics. The heroes are defined by universal virtues like courage and moral choices, not immutable characteristics or intersectional status. Harry, Hermione, and the Dumbledore's Army are judged entirely on merit.

Oikophobia4/10

The film criticizes the corruption and denialism of the Wizarding World's primary governing institution, the Ministry of Magic. This is not a generalized condemnation of the culture or ancestry but a focused attack on a failed, bureaucratic, and authoritarian *administration* (Cornelius Fudge and Dolores Umbridge) that is enabling a fascist threat. The heroes are working to save the 'home culture,' not deconstruct it.

Feminism3/10

Female characters like Hermione, Professor McGonagall, and Nymphadora Tonks are portrayed as intellectually formidable, powerfully magical, and morally upright. Hermione is the key strategic mind behind Dumbledore's Army. The main antagonist, Dolores Umbridge, is a powerful woman in government. While the ultimate authority figures remain male, the representation leans toward complementarity and strong female competence without advocating anti-natalism or portraying all males as bumbling idiots.

LGBTQ+1/10

The movie contains no representation or explicit mention of LGBTQ+ themes, alternative sexualities, or political lecturing regarding gender theory. The narrative is focused on an objective moral and political struggle, and teenage romance is presented as normative and private.

Anti-Theism1/10

The story operates on a strong, objective moral axis where transcendent values like love, self-sacrifice, and courage are the ultimate moral good that defeats pure, soul-corrupting evil. No real-world religion, particularly Christianity, is present, allowing for no direct anti-theist message. The morality is entirely objective and universally applicable.