← Back to Directory
The Devil Wears Prada
Movie

The Devil Wears Prada

2006Comedy, Drama

Woke Score
3
out of 10

Plot

In New York, the simple and naive just-graduated in journalism Andrea Sachs is hired to work as the second assistant of the powerful and sophisticated Miranda Priestly, the ruthless and merciless executive of the Runway fashion magazine. Andrea dreams to become a journalist and faces the opportunity as a temporary professional challenge. The first assistant Emily advises Andrea about the behavior and preferences of their cruel boss, and the stylist Nigel helps Andrea to dress more adequately for the environment. Andrea changes her attitude and behavior, affecting her private life and the relationship with her boyfriend Nate, her family and friends. In the end, Andrea learns that life is made of choices.

Overall Series Review

The Devil Wears Prada is a narrative focused on the high personal cost of cutthroat ambition and materialism within the fashion industry. The protagonist, Andrea Sachs, begins as a cynical outsider who must either conform to the world of Runway magazine or maintain her core values. Her journey shows her sacrificing her friends and boyfriend as she climbs the professional ladder, only to realize the powerful editor-in-chief, Miranda Priestly, is a miserable figure whose professional success has left her personally bankrupt. The film critiques the hyper-materialistic subculture of high fashion and ends with Andrea choosing authenticity, integrity, and relationships over the ultimate 'Girl Boss' power fantasy, illustrating that success at all costs is a spiritual and emotional failure. The movie's core themes are ambition, conformity, and the price of one's soul in the pursuit of an elite career.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

Characters are judged almost exclusively on professional merit and aesthetic conformity within a specific industry, not on race or immutable characteristics. The central conflict is a universal one about a naive newcomer striving for professional validation in a highly judgmental field. Diversity is not forced into the narrative as a political tool. The main characters' struggles transcend any specific intersectional hierarchy. The only notable characteristics highlighted are size and appearance as a currency for professional acceptance.

Oikophobia1/10

The film does not show hostility toward Western civilization, the home country, or ancestors. Instead, it portrays a very specific, insular, and toxic industry subculture (high fashion) as the source of corruption. The protagonist's 'home' life with her boyfriend and friends, which is representative of a normal American middle-class lifestyle, is framed as good, authentic, and what she eventually returns to. The narrative is a critique of materialism and ego, not a civilization.

Feminism4/10

The movie operates within a female-dominated industry, presenting Miranda Priestly as the quintessential 'Girl Boss' with absolute power. However, the narrative provides a direct critique of this archetype by consistently portraying Miranda's life as lonely, miserable, and requiring the sacrifice of family and marriage. The protagonist's arc is a rejection of the 'career is the only fulfillment' message, as she quits her job for the sake of her integrity and personal relationships. Male characters, while sometimes unsupportive of the career ambition, are not universally emasculated; one male co-worker serves as a crucial, competent, and supportive mentor.

LGBTQ+2/10

Alternative sexualities are a non-issue in the main plot. One prominent supporting character is coded as or openly gay, but his character is defined by his professional excellence and deep competency as a creative director. The film does not center sexual identity as the most important character trait. The focus remains on professional life and the protagonist's traditional relationship dynamic outside of work. The narrative offers no political lecturing on gender theory or the nuclear family structure.

Anti-Theism1/10

Religion is absent from the narrative, with no explicit hostility toward Christianity or traditional faith. The title uses the imagery of 'The Devil' to denote Miranda's ruthless, soul-corrupting nature, positioning her as a moral antagonist. The protagonist’s final decision to quit is a return to an objective moral and ethical standard, which values personal integrity and true human connection over a relativistic morality of power dynamics and corporate success.