← Back to Directory
IF
Movie

IF

2024 • Animation, Comedy, Drama

Woke Score
1.4
out of 10

Plot

A young girl who goes through a difficult experience begins to see everyone's imaginary friends who have been left behind as their real-life friends have grown up.

Overall Series Review

The film "IF" is a sentimental fantasy that explores the universal themes of childhood imagination, grief, and the importance of holding onto wonder as one grows up. The narrative centers on a young girl named Bea who, while dealing with the emotional difficulty of her father's illness, discovers she can see the imaginary friends (IFs) forgotten by their adult creators. Her mission, alongside a neighbor, is a quest to reunite these forgotten IFs with their former children. The movie does not engage with social commentary, identity politics, or cultural critique. Its core conflict is emotional and personal, focusing squarely on family bonds—specifically the relationship between a daughter and her sick father, and the loving support of her grandmother. Casting decisions for the main human roles are traditional, and the imaginary friends themselves are a menagerie of whimsical, non-human entities that represent creativity and emotional support. The movie is fundamentally a simple, heartfelt allegory about the power of memory and love in the face of sadness, making it an effort to connect with the 'inner child' of its audience rather than challenge their social or political views. It leans heavily on nostalgia and emotionally manipulative scoring, but its thematic content is universally accessible and traditional for a family film.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

The movie centers on the universal human experience of dealing with loss and the power of imagination, completely ignoring themes of race, systemic oppression, or intersectional hierarchy. The protagonist's character arc is driven by her empathy and personal circumstances, not her immutable characteristics. The live-action cast is diverse in supporting roles, but the film's message is entirely colorblind, focusing on the content of the soul and the strength of personal connection.

Oikophobia1/10

The story strongly celebrates foundational Western institutions: a functional, loving family unit (father, mother, grandmother) is the central emotional pillar, and the mission is an act of care and kindness. The core message promotes a 'Chesterton's Fence' idea by asserting the value of the 'imaginary friends' from the past and actively trying to restore them to the present. There is no deconstruction of heritage or framing of the home culture as fundamentally corrupt.

Feminism2/10

The main character, Bea, is a competent young girl who drives the plot with her initiative and compassion, which is a common and non-ideological element for a children's protagonist. She is not a 'Mary Sue' as she is shown struggling with her situation and her character's competence develops through her actions. The main male characters, her father and Cal, are sympathetic and crucial figures; the father is the source of her emotional distress and a figure of love, not a toxic or bumbling male. Motherhood is presented tragically (Bea's mother passed away) and respectfully as an integral part of her past happiness.

LGBTQ+1/10

The movie contains no evident elements of sexual ideology, 'queer theory' concepts, or deconstruction of the nuclear family structure. The family unit presented is traditional, and the imaginary friends are non-human fantasy creatures whose purpose is pure companionship and emotional support, not the centering of alternative sexual identities.

Anti-Theism1/10

The film has a secular, humanistic moral framework where 'imagination,' 'wonder,' and 'love' are presented as a transcendent force that overcomes sadness. There is no inclusion of or hostility toward organized religion, specifically Christianity. Morality is objective within the world's rules: forgetting your imaginary friend is bad; remembering them is good. The lack of religious content means it defaults to a low score for not being explicitly 'anti-theistic'.