← Back to Directory
Law Abiding Citizen
Movie

Law Abiding Citizen

2009Action, Crime, Drama

Woke Score
4
out of 10

Plot

Clyde Shelton's family is brutally murdered. The ones responsible are caught. However, because of improper procedure, the D.A., Nick Rice only has circumstantial evidence. So he decides to get one of them to testify against the other. When Shelton learns of this, he is not happy. Ten years later, the one who was convicted is being executed but something goes wrong; his execution goes awry and he suffers. They learn that someone tampered with the machine. And the other one is found dead, killed in a gruesome manner. Rice suspects Shelton, so he has him picked up. At first, Shelton agrees to a plea agreement with Rice but changes his mind. It appears that Shelton is not done, it appears he blames the whole system and is declaring war on it going after everyone involved with his family's case. So Rice has to stop him but Shelton is way ahead of him.

Overall Series Review

Law Abiding Citizen is a grim revenge thriller that critiques the compromises and failings of the modern American legal system. The narrative follows Clyde Shelton, a man whose family is murdered, leading him on a meticulously planned mission to expose and destroy every official involved in a plea bargain that set a killer free. The film's primary focus is the moral and structural bankruptcy of the judicial and political establishment, contrasting the ideals of justice with the reality of bureaucratic efficiency and self-interest. The central conflict is purely ideological and ethical: procedural law versus genuine moral justice. The final resolution sees the protagonist, a District Attorney, resort to the same extrajudicial violence he condemned, highlighting the system's failure to defeat its enemy through legitimate means. The movie is violent, nihilistic, and focused on challenging the viewer's faith in civil institutions.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

The core conflict is not based on race or intersectional hierarchy. The vigilante is a White man, and the main authority figures he targets, like prosecutor Nick Rice and Mayor April Henry, are Black, but their actions are condemned on the grounds of professional and moral failure, not their immutable characteristics. The narrative critiques a systemic failure of law and ethics, not a privileged class. The characters are judged by their professional compromises and moral decisions.

Oikophobia7/10

The film functions as an explicit and violent attack on the entire American legal and political system, portraying the institutional structure as fundamentally corrupt and more concerned with statistics and self-interest than justice. The climax involves an attempt to blow up City Hall, representing a comprehensive deconstruction of a core civilizational institution. The ending is ambiguous, as the 'hero' must violate the law to stop the vigilante, suggesting the system is not ultimately salvageable through legal means.

Feminism3/10

The female roles are mainly functional. Clyde's wife and daughter are victims, serving as the common trope of using female suffering to motivate a male character's quest. Female authority figures like Mayor Henry (Viola Davis) and assistant D.A. Sarah Lowell are either portrayed as cynically pragmatic politicians or are murdered as collateral damage for their complicity in the corrupt system. There is no 'Girl Boss' trope present, nor any focus on anti-natalism; the male-male conflict dominates the screen.

LGBTQ+1/10

Alternative sexualities, gender identity, or a critique of the nuclear family are entirely absent from the film's thematic content. The narrative focuses exclusively on the failures of the criminal justice system and the resulting vigilante action. The family units shown, both Clyde's deceased family and Nick Rice's family, are traditional male-female pairings.

Anti-Theism6/10

While not directly hostile to traditional religion, the film operates entirely within a framework of moral relativism and a spiritual vacuum. The 'justice' sought by the protagonist is achieved only when he casts aside the objective legal-rational system, committing an extrajudicial act that 'fucks' the villain's civil rights. This moral conclusion affirms that pragmatic, subjective force is superior to any objective or transcendent moral law, thereby rejecting the authority of a higher moral source.