← Back to The Umbrella Academy
The Umbrella Academy Season 1
Season Analysis

The Umbrella Academy

Season 1 Analysis

Season Woke Score
5
out of 10

Season Overview

Reunited by their father's death, estranged siblings with extraordinary powers uncover shocking family secrets -- and a looming threat to humanity.

Season Review

Season 1 of "The Umbrella Academy" focuses on the severe trauma inflicted upon seven adopted superpowered siblings by their eccentric, emotionally abusive, and scientifically-driven father, Sir Reginald Hargreeves. The narrative is a character-driven drama about a deeply dysfunctional family attempting to stop a looming global apocalypse, which is ultimately caused by their father's own cruel parenting methods. Casting features a mix of races for the siblings, a departure from the all-white comic source material, yet the plot makes no mention of race or identity politics in the modern setting. One of the main characters is openly non-heterosexual with a significant, emotional storyline centered on lost love. The primary source of evil and corruption is the white male patriarch, who is consistently vilified for his cold, transactional view of his children. While not overtly anti-theist, the show operates in a world where moral law is entirely subjective, stemming from individual and familial chaos rather than any objective or transcendent source.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics5/10

The main cast of adopted siblings is intentionally cast with actors of different races, with three of the seven primary characters being people of color, which is a change from the original comic book. The narrative is entirely colorblind, meaning race is never mentioned as a factor in the characters' lives, but the diversity is a noticeable, manufactured addition to the source material. The most vilified character and the source of nearly all the family's problems is the patriarch, Sir Reginald Hargreeves, a wealthy, white, Western-archetype male.

Oikophobia6/10

The central institutional structure being critiqued is the family unit and the concept of the 'superhero institution' which is built on the cold, abusive principles of the patriarch. The series critiques the family home as fundamentally corrupting and traumatizing for its members, framing the adoptive father/ancestor figure as an 'asshole'. The critique is focused on the individual's failure as a father and the resulting familial chaos, rather than a broad indictment of Western society outside of this eccentric, abusive miniature institution.

Feminism5/10

The most powerful character in the family, Vanya, is a female character who starts the season as the powerless 'black sheep' and is revealed to be the apocalypse-causing force. Her tremendous power is directly linked to her suppressed emotions, playing into the trope of the powerful woman who is dangerous due to an inability to control her feelings. The other main female sibling, Allison, possesses a power of manipulating truth with her voice, which is graphically destroyed in a conflict with Vanya. The robot mother, Grace, is a submissive, nurturing figure who is subservient to the abusive male father.

LGBTQ+7/10

One of the main siblings, Klaus, is non-heterosexual, and his character arc includes a significant flashback sequence where he falls in love with a male soldier named Dave while traveling back in time to the Vietnam War. This lost love becomes a major emotional anchor for his character and his substance abuse struggle. Klaus frequently wears women's clothing, and his gender non-conforming presentation is treated as a simple matter of fact by his siblings. The presence of alternative sexuality is integrated as a normal and significant part of a core character's identity.

Anti-Theism3/10

The show is predominantly secular, with the moral philosophy revolving around the psychological effects of trauma and a fractured family dynamic. The primary antagonist is a time-travelling, bureaucratic organization called The Commission, not a religious entity. No traditional religious characters are present to be vilified, and the concepts of right and wrong are derived from individual connection and self-actualization, suggesting a subjective moral landscape rather than one based on objective, transcendent law.