← Back to Directory
Red Lights
Movie

Red Lights

2012 • Unknown

Woke Score
2
out of 10

Plot

Two investigators of paranormal hoaxes, the veteran Dr. Margaret Matheson and her young assistant, Tom Buckley, study the most varied metaphysical phenomena with the aim of proving their fraudulent origins. Simon Silver, a legendary blind psychic, reappears after an enigmatic absence of 30 years to become the greatest international challenge to both orthodox science and professional sceptics. Tom starts to develop an intense obsession with Silver, whose magnetism becomes stronger with each new manifestation of inexplicable events. As Tom gets closer to Silver, tension mounts, and his worldview is threatened to its core.

Overall Series Review

The film centers on the philosophical and scientific conflict between staunch skepticism and the paranormal. Dr. Margaret Matheson, a world-renowned female psychologist, and her assistant, physicist Tom Buckley, dedicate their professional lives to exposing frauds in the psychic community. The narrative does not focus on identity or political issues, but on character competence, rational inquiry, and the human desire to believe in the inexplicable. The casting is meritocratic, and the primary characters' struggle is an internal, existential one against deception and the limits of science. The film's primary 'woke' element is the depiction of the lead scientist as a powerful, non-sexualized female authority figure who mentors the male protagonist, a dynamic that is established entirely on professional expertise. The central theme of the story involves questions of faith and reason, without vilifying traditional Western religion or culture.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

Characters are defined by their scientific expertise as a psychologist and a physicist. The casting, while predominantly white, places high value on professional merit and intellectual capability over immutable characteristics. The story includes no commentary on 'whiteness' or intersectional hierarchy.

Oikophobia2/10

The setting is a modern, Western academic and professional environment, and the central conflict revolves around a cornerstone of Western thought: the Enlightenment's reliance on empirical science and skepticism. There is no depiction of the home culture as fundamentally corrupt or racist, and no external culture is framed as morally superior.

Feminism4/10

Dr. Margaret Matheson is a highly respected, authoritative female university professor and the leader of the investigative team, acting as the mentor to her male subordinate. This establishes a powerful, non-traditional female hierarchy. However, her motivations are tied to an unaddressed family tragedy (her comatose son), a traditionally feminine driver, and she is removed from the conflict, leaving the final victory to the male lead.

LGBTQ+1/10

The plot focuses strictly on paranormal investigation and the clash between science and the unexplainable. There is no presence of alternative sexual identity, deconstruction of the nuclear family, or gender ideology content within the narrative.

Anti-Theism3/10

The core debate is between scientific skepticism and the paranormal, specifically focusing on fraudulent psychics who prey on the vulnerable, not on traditional religion. The film explores the human need for 'faith' and the afterlife, but it does not present Christian characters as villains or lecture that traditional religion is the root of evil. The antagonist is a charismatic showman, not a religious figure.