← Back to Directory
The Expendables 3
Movie

The Expendables 3

2014 • Unknown

Woke Score
2
out of 10

Plot

Barney, Christmas and the rest of the team comes face-to-face with Conrad Stonebanks, who years ago co-founded The Expendables with Barney. Stonebanks subsequently became a ruthless arms trader and someone who Barney was forced to kill… or so he thought. Stonebanks, who eluded death once before, now is making it his mission to end The Expendables -- but Barney has other plans. Barney decides that he has to fight old blood with new blood, and brings in a new era of Expendables team members, recruiting individuals who are younger, faster and more tech-savvy. The latest mission becomes a clash of classic old-school style versus high-tech expertise in the Expendables’ most personal battle yet.

Overall Series Review

The Expendables 3 is an action film centered on a generational conflict, pitting the veteran 'old blood' mercenaries against a 'new blood' team of younger, tech-savvy specialists. The plot is a straight-forward revenge and rescue mission against a former teammate turned arms dealer. Character value and team inclusion are consistently determined by combat skill, technical expertise, or experience. The movie’s casting is racially diverse across both the veteran and new teams, but these characteristics do not drive the plot or lead to any political lecturing. The narrative celebrates old-school action heroics and loyalty. The only significant female character is Luna, a close-quarters combat expert, who is recruited for her merit and skill but is not presented as instantly superior to all male characters. The film is singularly focused on action and does not engage with themes of civilizational critique, family structure, or religion.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

Characters are judged primarily by their combat and technical merit, reflecting a universal meritocracy. The cast is diverse by nature of hiring international action stars, not through forced insertion to lecture on intersectionality. The villain is a white male, but the core heroes are also predominantly white males, making the conflict personal and tactical rather than racial.

Oikophobia1/10

The film avoids any hostility toward Western civilization or heritage. The conflict is a simple, secular good vs. evil scenario where a team of mercenaries, often representing Western action tropes, fight a global arms dealer. The film unironically celebrates the heroes' classic style and institutional loyalty to their own team.

Feminism2/10

One prominent female character, Luna, is recruited for her skill as a fighter after demonstrating her abilities in a nightclub. She is highly competent but is part of the younger, less experienced team that is captured and needs rescue by the male-led veteran team. She is a skilled character based on merit, not a flawless 'Girl Boss' figure designed to emasculate the men, nor does the film contain anti-natalist messaging.

LGBTQ+1/10

The movie contains virtually no LGBTQ+ content. A brief, ambiguous moment involving two male characters being told to 'get a room' by another character is delivered as a lighthearted joke. This is not an attempt to center alternative sexuality, deconstruct the nuclear family, or engage in gender ideology lecturing.

Anti-Theism1/10

The narrative is completely secular, focusing on a global mercenary conflict against an arms dealer. The film does not contain any criticism or defense of religion, especially Christianity. The moral framework is a simple, objective one of stopping a dangerous criminal, not one that embraces moral relativism or demonizes people of faith.