← Back to Better Call Saul
Better Call Saul Season 1
Season Analysis

Better Call Saul

Season 1 Analysis

Season Woke Score
2.4
out of 10

Season Overview

Jimmy McGill was a small-time lawyer, hustling to make ends meet. This is how the search for his destiny and the story of Saul Goodman collide.

Season Review

Season 1 of "Better Call Saul" is a character-driven tragedy focused on the moral decline of Jimmy McGill and his struggle to achieve success honestly in the American legal system. The narrative is universally focused on the content of a man's soul and his reaction to adversity, rather than on immutable characteristics or identity politics. The show explores themes of ambition, corruption, and the difficulty of escaping one's past. The primary female lead, Kim Wexler, is highly competent, but her struggles are framed as navigating a male-dominated corporate world, not as a simplistic 'Girl Boss' trope. The series does not engage with sexual or religious political themes, instead concentrating on the existential moral vacuum of its main characters. The show's conflict stems from individual human failure and betrayal, especially the sibling rivalry between Jimmy and his elitist brother Chuck, which is a classic dramatic premise rather than a socio-political lecture.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics2/10

The core dramatic conflict is between two white brothers, Jimmy and Chuck McGill, based on their individual merit, class, and moral character, not race. The central cast is predominantly white. The show is not built on an intersectional framework. The cartel characters (Tuco, Nacho) are non-white, but their roles as criminal antagonists are based on plot function in a crime drama set in New Mexico, not on a narrative designed to vilify 'whiteness' or lecture on systemic oppression.

Oikophobia2/10

The narrative critiques the failure of the American legal system to reward true merit (Jimmy's struggle for legitimacy) and highlights institutional corruption (the Kettlemans, the nursing home fraud). However, the critique is aimed at individual moral failures within the institutions, not a framing of Western civilization or the nation as fundamentally wicked. There is no 'Noble Savage' trope used to contrast Western society with a spiritually superior 'Other.'

Feminism4/10

Kim Wexler is introduced as a highly intelligent, dedicated, and skilled lawyer, often serving as a moral compass for Jimmy. She faces clear obstacles and mistreatment from her male bosses (Chuck and Howard) who undermine her, which the show frames as workplace sexism and gender inequality. Her struggle against the male-dominated corporate law world aligns with a progressive, though not fully 'Mary Sue,' feminist critique. The story is completely career-focused and avoids all themes of motherhood or family structure, which is a mild indicator of the anti-natalist tendency.

LGBTQ+1/10

The first season contains no characters or plot lines that center around alternative sexualities, sexual identity, or gender ideology. The main romantic relationship is the heterosexual coupling of Jimmy McGill and Kim Wexler. The overall structure is normative, and the narrative does not engage in any form of queer theory lecturing.

Anti-Theism3/10

The series is a neo-Faustian tragedy that explores nihilism, moral relativism, and the ethical decline of its protagonist. Jimmy's descent is fueled by his belief that there is 'no divine justice' and that morality is subjective, a philosophy of 'lucky and unlucky people' that drives his actions. While this is a form of moral relativism, it is presented as the character's tragic flaw, not the show's transcendent moral law. The narrative itself frames this descent as a bad thing, suggesting a higher, though secular, objective truth of 'good versus bad.' No overt hostility or vilification is aimed at Christianity or traditional religious figures.