← Back to Directory
Unnatural
Movie

Unnatural

2015Unknown

Woke Score
6
out of 10

Plot

Global climate change prompts a scientific corporation to genetically modify Alaskan polar bears with horrific and deadly results.

Overall Series Review

Unnatural is a creature feature that centers its horror around a clear environmental message: the danger of corporate and scientific arrogance in tampering with nature. The narrative establishes a direct conflict between the 'civilized' city dwellers—represented by a greedy corporation and a loathsome, racist photographer—and the 'hardy locals,' which include a rugged lodge owner and his wise, indigenous staff. The film employs a clear moral hierarchy where the villainous characters are consistently associated with modern, capitalistic, and often arrogant Western characteristics, while those closer to nature and local traditions are the competent heroes. The high score is driven by the overt Oikophobia and Identity Politics elements that frame the central conflict.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics7/10

The plot uses race and culture to establish a moral hierarchy. The photographer is explicitly framed as a loathsome white male, symbolizing the 'civilized man's' arrogance, and he is a racist who insults the indigenous people, making him one of the primary villains who deserves to be a victim. The indigenous local characters, who possess native lore and knowledge, are depicted as wise and are aligned with the competent, non-corporate lodge owner against the corporate/city interlopers. The moral value of a character is largely determined by their alignment with or opposition to this cultural conflict, not purely by universal merit.

Oikophobia8/10

The central conflict is a direct result of 'Global climate change' prompting a corporation's hubris in attempting to 'save' a species through genetic modification, which is condemned as recklessly 'tampering with nature.' The character representing the 'arrogance and ignorance of the “civilized man”' who believes nature is only 'to be used by Man' is made explicitly villainous and set up for a horrific death. This framing positions Western scientific/industrial culture as fundamentally corrupt and destructive, achieving a high level of civilizational self-hatred by celebrating the destructive power of nature's pushback against the modern experiment.

Feminism3/10

The gender dynamics are mixed and do not strongly push a 'Girl Boss' narrative. The male photographer is a bumbling, toxic idiot, but the main hero and anchor is Martin Nakos, a rugged, competent male survivalist. The principal female authority figure, Dr. Lindval, is the scientist responsible for the catastrophe who is characterized as either evil or having ulterior motives. Other female characters are one-dimensional models, often portrayed as stereotypical 'eye candy' or self-obsessed prima-donnas. The film’s focus is not on female empowerment or anti-natalism.

LGBTQ+1/10

The narrative is focused entirely on a creature-feature scenario driven by environmental themes, scientific hubris, and a clash of cultures. There is no evidence in the plot or character descriptions of centering alternative sexualities, promoting gender ideology, or lecturing on queer theory. Traditional male-female pairings or the nuclear family are not deconstructed or addressed.

Anti-Theism2/10

The core morality is transcendent in a secular sense, advocating for 'Nature's Law' against human tampering, not necessarily a purely subjective morality. There is no explicit hostility toward organized religion or Christianity, and Christian characters are not depicted as villains or bigots. In fact, one of the local characters discusses the monster in terms of native lore about a 'vengeful spirit,' introducing a spiritual, non-materialist element to the threat.